Bhutanese vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from South Africa
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from South Africa
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,462,899 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,300,500 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 30.0% |
| Range | 28.5% | 29.0% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 13.2% |
| Median | 11.5% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from South Africa by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |