Bangladeshi vs British Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
British
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
British
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs British Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,368,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | British |
Minimum | 3.4% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 15.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 12.2% | 99.1% |
Mean | 7.0% | 13.1% |
Median | 6.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and British by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |