Armenian vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Armenian
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Armenians
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,934,651 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 7.9%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 5.9% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 25.7% | 40.3% |
Range | 19.9% | 38.0% |
Mean | 16.3% | 18.5% |
Median | 16.5% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |