Alaskan Athabascan vs Cajun Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Cajun
Disability
Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Cajuns
14.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cajun Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,092 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,702,868 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Cajun |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 9.6% |
| Maximum | 41.9% | 35.2% |
| Range | 37.5% | 25.5% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 17.8% |
| Median | 16.0% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Cajuns by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Navajo (14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |