Afghan vs Creek Female Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Creek
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Afghans
Creek
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Creek Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,868,441 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,448,690 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 39.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Creek |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 42.6% |
| Range | 12.3% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 20.5% |
| Median | 11.0% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Israeli (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |