Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Poor
Good
1,605
SOCIAL INDEX
13.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
296th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,526,431 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from St. Vincent and the Grenadines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 55.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,394 compared to $127,500, a difference of 47.6%), and median family income ($90,094 compared to $131,067, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,230 compared to $62,083, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $49,818, a difference of 18.3%), and median earnings ($45,908 compared to $59,433, a difference of 29.5%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,270
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,094
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,690
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,908
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,665
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,230
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,888
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,394
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,922
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
25.5%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 89.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 65.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 65.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.5%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 47.6%), male unemployment (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
7.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.7%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (26.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.4%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 66.5%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 58.3%), and married-couple households (38.7% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.4%), family households (63.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.7%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.3%
Exceptional
23.6%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 213.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 118.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (64.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 37.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 69.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 90.6%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
10.1%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.0%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 74.2%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.6%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.0%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
13.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.6%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.6%).
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from St. Vincent and the GrenadinesImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.79%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%