Immigrants from Laos vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,311,789 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $55,543, a difference of 11.0%), per capita income ($37,857 compared to $41,495, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $93,661, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $59,934, a difference of 5.7%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $97,958, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.3%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.65%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.44%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 75.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 29.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.0%).