Immigrants from Fiji vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,288,688 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.468% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 467.5 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $85,144, a difference of 22.1%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $78,803, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $90,951, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $52,626, a difference of 8.5%), and per capita income ($42,694 compared to $38,560, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 12.7%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.2%), family households (68.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 9.9%), college, 1 year or more (56.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%).