Cuban vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,884,816 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $61,000, a difference of 24.1%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $90,345, a difference of 6.3%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $50,691, a difference of 0.070%), per capita income ($37,383 compared to $37,464, a difference of 0.22%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $80,544, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.2%), and receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 26.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 19.8%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.33%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.0%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.5%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 5.7%).