British West Indian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

British West Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

British West Indians

Burmese

Tragic
Exceptional
938
SOCIAL INDEX
6.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
333rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in British West Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,014,002 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.079% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 78.9 Burmese.
British West Indian Integration in Burmese Communities

British West Indian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 55.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $121,444, a difference of 41.9%), and median family income ($88,987 compared to $123,369, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $54,800, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $44,911, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $54,559, a difference of 22.5%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,330
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,987
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,647
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,552
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,636
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,299
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,844
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,565
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,571
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,463
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
28.0%

British West Indian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 106.8%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 69.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 12.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
8.6%

British West Indian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.3%), and unemployment (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.5%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
24.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

British West Indian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.0%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

British West Indian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.6%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 44.1%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.2%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.3%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Exceptional
26.4%

British West Indian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 207.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 97.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 63.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 80.4%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.7%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

British West Indian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.8%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 61.1%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.5%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.4%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

British West Indian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.2%).
British West Indian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricBritish West IndianBurmese
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.99%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%