Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1.Savanna71.3%43.8%(+27.5)#144.0%(+27.3)#108
2.Terlton70.5%43.8%(+26.7)#244.0%(+26.5)#142
3.Wilson68.5%43.8%(+24.7)#344.0%(+24.5)#232
4.Medicine Park67.2%43.8%(+23.4)#444.0%(+23.2)#311
5.Cleora66.7%43.8%(+22.9)#544.0%(+22.7)#339
6.Schulter66.0%43.8%(+22.2)#644.0%(+22.0)#400
7.Carnegie65.7%43.8%(+21.9)#744.0%(+21.7)#415
8.Clinton65.3%43.8%(+21.5)#844.0%(+21.3)#457
9.Kansas64.5%43.8%(+20.7)#944.0%(+20.5)#546
10.Vici64.3%43.8%(+20.5)#1044.0%(+20.3)#589
11.Erick64.2%43.8%(+20.4)#1144.0%(+20.2)#604
12.Arnett63.6%43.8%(+19.8)#1244.0%(+19.6)#684
13.Delaware63.5%43.8%(+19.7)#1344.0%(+19.5)#702
14.Taylor Ferry63.4%43.8%(+19.6)#1444.0%(+19.4)#724
15.Corn63.1%43.8%(+19.3)#1544.0%(+19.1)#790
16.Cyril62.7%43.8%(+18.9)#1644.0%(+18.7)#833
17.Disney62.5%43.8%(+18.7)#1744.0%(+18.5)#884
18.Forest Park62.4%43.8%(+18.6)#1844.0%(+18.4)#901
19.Liberty62.3%43.8%(+18.5)#1944.0%(+18.3)#932
20.Snyder61.8%43.8%(+18.0)#2044.0%(+17.8)#1,013
21.Maysville61.5%43.8%(+17.7)#2144.0%(+17.5)#1,074
22.Antlers61.2%43.8%(+17.4)#2244.0%(+17.2)#1,165
23.Mooreland61.2%43.8%(+17.4)#2344.0%(+17.2)#1,174
24.Piedmont60.7%43.8%(+16.9)#2444.0%(+16.7)#1,270
25.Locust Grove60.5%43.8%(+16.7)#2544.0%(+16.5)#1,312
26.Randlett60.4%43.8%(+16.6)#2644.0%(+16.4)#1,363
27.Paden60.3%43.8%(+16.5)#2744.0%(+16.3)#1,402
28.Bray60.2%43.8%(+16.4)#2844.0%(+16.2)#1,422
29.Hobart60.1%43.8%(+16.3)#2944.0%(+16.1)#1,449
30.Dewar60.0%43.8%(+16.2)#3044.0%(+16.0)#1,486
31.Cedar Lake60.0%43.8%(+16.2)#3144.0%(+16.0)#1,491
32.Thomas59.8%43.8%(+16.0)#3244.0%(+15.8)#1,513
33.Cleveland59.6%43.8%(+15.8)#3344.0%(+15.6)#1,545
34.Lequire59.5%43.8%(+15.7)#3444.0%(+15.5)#1,624
35.Texhoma59.1%43.8%(+15.3)#3544.0%(+15.1)#1,746
36.Katie59.1%43.8%(+15.3)#3644.0%(+15.1)#1,754
37.Bluejacket59.0%43.8%(+15.2)#3744.0%(+15.0)#1,790
38.Laverne58.5%43.8%(+14.7)#3844.0%(+14.5)#1,901
39.Atwood58.4%43.8%(+14.6)#3944.0%(+14.4)#1,943
40.Pawhuska58.1%43.8%(+14.3)#4044.0%(+14.1)#2,046
41.Pond Creek58.1%43.8%(+14.3)#4144.0%(+14.1)#2,061
42.Welling57.8%43.8%(+14.0)#4244.0%(+13.8)#2,143
43.Burbank57.5%43.8%(+13.7)#4344.0%(+13.5)#2,252
44.Lake Aluma57.5%43.8%(+13.7)#4444.0%(+13.5)#2,253
45.Tryon57.3%43.8%(+13.5)#4544.0%(+13.3)#2,331
46.Bernice57.0%43.8%(+13.2)#4644.0%(+13.0)#2,462
47.Davis56.8%43.8%(+13.0)#4744.0%(+12.8)#2,493
48.Bushyhead56.7%43.8%(+12.9)#4844.0%(+12.7)#2,532
49.Grove56.6%43.8%(+12.8)#4944.0%(+12.6)#2,543
50.Haskell56.5%43.8%(+12.7)#5044.0%(+12.5)#2,591
51.Elmore City56.5%43.8%(+12.7)#5144.0%(+12.5)#2,605
52.Ramona56.5%43.8%(+12.7)#5244.0%(+12.5)#2,608
53.Prue56.5%43.8%(+12.7)#5344.0%(+12.5)#2,624
54.Lehigh56.5%43.8%(+12.7)#5444.0%(+12.5)#2,633
55.Oologah55.9%43.8%(+12.1)#5544.0%(+11.9)#2,864
56.Tupelo55.5%43.8%(+11.7)#5644.0%(+11.5)#3,031
57.Carney55.4%43.8%(+11.6)#5744.0%(+11.4)#3,082
58.Canute55.2%43.8%(+11.4)#5844.0%(+11.2)#3,175
59.Whitehorn Cove55.1%43.8%(+11.3)#5944.0%(+11.1)#3,208
60.Kingston54.8%43.8%(+11.0)#6044.0%(+10.8)#3,302
61.Chickasha54.6%43.8%(+10.8)#6144.0%(+10.6)#3,361
62.Haileyville54.5%43.8%(+10.7)#6244.0%(+10.5)#3,442
63.Achille54.5%43.8%(+10.7)#6344.0%(+10.5)#3,450
64.Vinita54.3%43.8%(+10.5)#6444.0%(+10.3)#3,529
65.Millerton54.3%43.8%(+10.5)#6544.0%(+10.3)#3,569
66.Reydon54.3%43.8%(+10.5)#6644.0%(+10.3)#3,572
67.Wetumka54.0%43.8%(+10.2)#6744.0%(+10.0)#3,678
68.Elk City53.6%43.8%(+9.80)#6844.0%(+9.60)#3,803
69.Woodall53.6%43.8%(+9.80)#6944.0%(+9.60)#3,834
70.Bokoshe53.5%43.8%(+9.70)#7044.0%(+9.50)#3,897
71.Blackwell53.3%43.8%(+9.50)#7144.0%(+9.30)#3,988
72.Lawrence Creek53.3%43.8%(+9.50)#7244.0%(+9.30)#4,063
73.Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County53.1%43.8%(+9.30)#7344.0%(+9.10)#4,153
74.Cookson52.9%43.8%(+9.10)#7444.0%(+8.90)#4,231
75.Foster52.8%43.8%(+9.00)#7544.0%(+8.80)#4,289
76.Brent52.7%43.8%(+8.90)#7644.0%(+8.70)#4,334
77.Oakhurst52.6%43.8%(+8.80)#7744.0%(+8.60)#4,365
78.Justice52.5%43.8%(+8.70)#7844.0%(+8.50)#4,410
79.Gene Autry52.5%43.8%(+8.70)#7944.0%(+8.50)#4,471
80.Tonkawa52.3%43.8%(+8.50)#8044.0%(+8.30)#4,556
81.Dickson52.3%43.8%(+8.50)#8144.0%(+8.30)#4,571
82.Gracemont52.3%43.8%(+8.50)#8244.0%(+8.30)#4,601
83.Mccord52.2%43.8%(+8.40)#8344.0%(+8.20)#4,638
84.Blanchard52.0%43.8%(+8.20)#8444.0%(+8.00)#4,733
85.East Duke52.0%43.8%(+8.20)#8544.0%(+8.00)#4,761
86.Roland51.7%43.8%(+7.90)#8644.0%(+7.70)#4,889
87.Central High51.6%43.8%(+7.80)#8744.0%(+7.60)#4,950
88.Cedar Valley51.6%43.8%(+7.80)#8844.0%(+7.60)#4,963
89.Longtown51.5%43.8%(+7.70)#8944.0%(+7.50)#4,997
90.New Cordell51.5%43.8%(+7.70)#9044.0%(+7.50)#4,999
91.Drumright51.5%43.8%(+7.70)#9144.0%(+7.50)#5,004
92.Meeker51.5%43.8%(+7.70)#9244.0%(+7.50)#5,021
93.Hydro51.5%43.8%(+7.70)#9344.0%(+7.50)#5,026
94.Goodwell51.4%43.8%(+7.60)#9444.0%(+7.40)#5,106
95.Collinsville51.2%43.8%(+7.40)#9544.0%(+7.20)#5,218
96.Prague51.1%43.8%(+7.30)#9644.0%(+7.10)#5,307
97.Langston51.0%43.8%(+7.20)#9744.0%(+7.00)#5,367
98.Bridge Creek51.0%43.8%(+7.20)#9844.0%(+7.00)#5,384
99.Ponca City50.7%43.8%(+6.90)#9944.0%(+6.70)#5,518
100.Hammon50.7%43.8%(+6.90)#10044.0%(+6.70)#5,574

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma are:
#1
71.3%
#2
70.5%
#3
68.5%
#4
67.2%
#5
66.7%
#6
66.0%
#7
65.7%
#8
65.3%
#9
64.5%
#10
64.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma?
Savanna has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma with 71.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma is 43.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.