Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1.Prestonsburg83.2%44.2%(+39.0)#144.0%(+39.2)#10
2.Lebanon81.4%44.2%(+37.2)#244.0%(+37.4)#14
3.Salyersville71.1%44.2%(+26.9)#344.0%(+27.1)#123
4.Morganfield68.3%44.2%(+24.1)#444.0%(+24.3)#238
5.Edmonton68.1%44.2%(+23.9)#544.0%(+24.1)#259
6.Sandy Hook67.2%44.2%(+23.0)#644.0%(+23.2)#307
7.Ten Broeck66.5%44.2%(+22.3)#744.0%(+22.5)#353
8.Lewisport66.2%44.2%(+22.0)#844.0%(+22.2)#375
9.Sanders65.5%44.2%(+21.3)#944.0%(+21.5)#434
10.Campbellsville65.4%44.2%(+21.2)#1044.0%(+21.4)#441
11.Warsaw65.1%44.2%(+20.9)#1144.0%(+21.1)#492
12.Creekside64.5%44.2%(+20.3)#1244.0%(+20.5)#554
13.Gamaliel64.4%44.2%(+20.2)#1344.0%(+20.4)#570
14.New Haven64.3%44.2%(+20.1)#1444.0%(+20.3)#584
15.Camargo64.0%44.2%(+19.8)#1544.0%(+20.0)#636
16.Calhoun63.3%44.2%(+19.1)#1644.0%(+19.3)#736
17.Cadiz62.5%44.2%(+18.3)#1744.0%(+18.5)#857
18.Livermore62.5%44.2%(+18.3)#1844.0%(+18.5)#866
19.Hustonville62.3%44.2%(+18.1)#1944.0%(+18.3)#926
20.Catlettsburg62.1%44.2%(+17.9)#2044.0%(+18.1)#962
21.Hindman62.1%44.2%(+17.9)#2144.0%(+18.1)#972
22.Strathmoor Manor62.0%44.2%(+17.8)#2244.0%(+18.0)#990
23.Taylorsville61.8%44.2%(+17.6)#2344.0%(+17.8)#1,011
24.North Middletown61.8%44.2%(+17.6)#2444.0%(+17.8)#1,018
25.Willisburg61.3%44.2%(+17.1)#2544.0%(+17.3)#1,145
26.Smiths Grove61.1%44.2%(+16.9)#2644.0%(+17.1)#1,207
27.Maysville60.9%44.2%(+16.7)#2744.0%(+16.9)#1,236
28.Hendron60.9%44.2%(+16.7)#2844.0%(+16.9)#1,238
29.Glasgow60.4%44.2%(+16.2)#2944.0%(+16.4)#1,336
30.Science Hill60.1%44.2%(+15.9)#3044.0%(+16.1)#1,460
31.Verona59.7%44.2%(+15.5)#3144.0%(+15.7)#1,536
32.Whitesburg59.5%44.2%(+15.3)#3244.0%(+15.5)#1,574
33.Sturgis58.7%44.2%(+14.5)#3344.0%(+14.7)#1,849
34.Bellewood58.3%44.2%(+14.1)#3444.0%(+14.3)#1,988
35.Rineyville58.1%44.2%(+13.9)#3544.0%(+14.1)#2,047
36.Oakbrook58.0%44.2%(+13.8)#3644.0%(+14.0)#2,076
37.Walton58.0%44.2%(+13.8)#3744.0%(+14.0)#2,079
38.Ghent57.5%44.2%(+13.3)#3844.0%(+13.5)#2,244
39.Fincastle57.0%44.2%(+12.8)#3944.0%(+13.0)#2,460
40.Prospect56.4%44.2%(+12.2)#4044.0%(+12.4)#2,651
41.Burkesville56.4%44.2%(+12.2)#4144.0%(+12.4)#2,668
42.Simpsonville56.3%44.2%(+12.1)#4244.0%(+12.3)#2,703
43.Ryland Heights56.3%44.2%(+12.1)#4344.0%(+12.3)#2,715
44.Glenview56.3%44.2%(+12.1)#4444.0%(+12.3)#2,724
45.Westwood56.3%44.2%(+12.1)#4544.0%(+12.3)#2,726
46.Stamping Ground56.1%44.2%(+11.9)#4644.0%(+12.1)#2,806
47.Pleasureville56.0%44.2%(+11.8)#4744.0%(+12.0)#2,838
48.Green Spring55.6%44.2%(+11.4)#4844.0%(+11.6)#2,964
49.Forest Hills55.5%44.2%(+11.3)#4944.0%(+11.5)#3,029
50.Owingsville55.4%44.2%(+11.2)#5044.0%(+11.4)#3,070
51.Bellemeade55.4%44.2%(+11.2)#5144.0%(+11.4)#3,077
52.Douglass Hills55.3%44.2%(+11.1)#5244.0%(+11.3)#3,093
53.Oakland55.3%44.2%(+11.1)#5344.0%(+11.3)#3,130
54.Mayfield55.1%44.2%(+10.9)#5444.0%(+11.1)#3,188
55.Manchester54.8%44.2%(+10.6)#5544.0%(+10.8)#3,300
56.Briarwood54.5%44.2%(+10.3)#5644.0%(+10.5)#3,452
57.Barbourville54.3%44.2%(+10.1)#5744.0%(+10.3)#3,532
58.Munfordville54.3%44.2%(+10.1)#5844.0%(+10.3)#3,542
59.Langdon Place54.3%44.2%(+10.1)#5944.0%(+10.3)#3,552
60.Fleming Neon54.3%44.2%(+10.1)#6044.0%(+10.3)#3,554
61.Nicholasville54.0%44.2%(+9.80)#6144.0%(+10.0)#3,655
62.Leitchfield54.0%44.2%(+9.80)#6244.0%(+10.0)#3,661
63.Bedford53.9%44.2%(+9.70)#6344.0%(+9.90)#3,720
64.Pewee Valley53.8%44.2%(+9.60)#6444.0%(+9.80)#3,731
65.Norwood53.8%44.2%(+9.60)#6544.0%(+9.80)#3,747
66.Versailles53.7%44.2%(+9.50)#6644.0%(+9.70)#3,759
67.Mockingbird Valley53.5%44.2%(+9.30)#6744.0%(+9.50)#3,909
68.Albany53.4%44.2%(+9.20)#6844.0%(+9.40)#3,941
69.Glenview Hills53.2%44.2%(+9.00)#6944.0%(+9.20)#4,106
70.Falmouth53.1%44.2%(+8.90)#7044.0%(+9.10)#4,133
71.Campbellsburg53.1%44.2%(+8.90)#7144.0%(+9.10)#4,147
72.Seneca Gardens53.0%44.2%(+8.80)#7244.0%(+9.00)#4,191
73.Hickman52.8%44.2%(+8.60)#7344.0%(+8.80)#4,264
74.Coal Run Village52.6%44.2%(+8.40)#7444.0%(+8.60)#4,367
75.Kingsley52.6%44.2%(+8.40)#7544.0%(+8.60)#4,377
76.Perryville52.5%44.2%(+8.30)#7644.0%(+8.50)#4,431
77.Grand Rivers52.5%44.2%(+8.30)#7744.0%(+8.50)#4,455
78.Lakeview Heights52.5%44.2%(+8.30)#7844.0%(+8.50)#4,461
79.Thornhill52.5%44.2%(+8.30)#7944.0%(+8.50)#4,474
80.Monticello52.2%44.2%(+8.00)#8044.0%(+8.20)#4,620
81.Russell52.2%44.2%(+8.00)#8144.0%(+8.20)#4,627
82.Hazard52.1%44.2%(+7.90)#8244.0%(+8.10)#4,675
83.Sharpsburg52.1%44.2%(+7.90)#8344.0%(+8.10)#4,710
84.Cambridge52.1%44.2%(+7.90)#8444.0%(+8.10)#4,714
85.Brownsboro Farm51.8%44.2%(+7.60)#8544.0%(+7.80)#4,853
86.Trenton51.6%44.2%(+7.40)#8644.0%(+7.60)#4,968
87.Reidland51.5%44.2%(+7.30)#8744.0%(+7.50)#4,988
88.Northfield51.5%44.2%(+7.30)#8844.0%(+7.50)#5,027
89.Fox Chase51.5%44.2%(+7.30)#8944.0%(+7.50)#5,040
90.Auburn51.3%44.2%(+7.10)#9044.0%(+7.30)#5,170
91.Philpot51.2%44.2%(+7.00)#9144.0%(+7.20)#5,247
92.Benton50.8%44.2%(+6.60)#9244.0%(+6.80)#5,467
93.Jeffersonville50.6%44.2%(+6.40)#9344.0%(+6.60)#5,638
94.Union50.5%44.2%(+6.30)#9444.0%(+6.50)#5,674
95.Murray Hill50.5%44.2%(+6.30)#9544.0%(+6.50)#5,737
96.Middletown50.3%44.2%(+6.10)#9644.0%(+6.30)#5,839
97.Hazel50.3%44.2%(+6.10)#9744.0%(+6.30)#5,901
98.Williamstown50.2%44.2%(+6.00)#9844.0%(+6.20)#5,943
99.Norbourne Estates50.0%44.2%(+5.80)#9944.0%(+6.00)#6,075
100.Goose Creek50.0%44.2%(+5.80)#10044.0%(+6.00)#6,081

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky are:
#1
83.2%
#2
81.4%
#3
71.1%
#4
68.3%
#5
68.1%
#6
67.2%
#7
66.5%
#8
66.2%
#9
65.5%
#10
65.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky?
Prestonsburg has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky with 83.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of Kentucky?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky is 44.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.